Arsenal FPL GW1 Review: Who to Buy, Sell and Hold
Arsenal opened the season with a 3-0 win over Coventry and returns spread right across the team: eight players on six points or more, three goalscorers, three assisters and a clean sheet. It is also the result that has moved more money than any other — roughly one in five transfers made in the game this week has been into an Arsenal player, and one in six has been out of one.
Both of those numbers are true at once, and that is the interesting part. Below: what every player paid and what he cost, where the minutes risk sits, and the buys, sells and swaps that follow with Friday's deadline coming.
What the match actually paid
| Player | PTS | £M | MIN | G | A | xGI | BPS | B |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Goalkeeper | ||||||||
| Raya1 SV | 6 | 6.0 | 90 | 0 | 0 | 0.00 | 24 | 0 |
| Defenders | ||||||||
| White | 11 | 5.5 | 90 | 0 | 1 | 0.39 | 37 | 2 |
| Calafiori | 9 | 5.5 | 80 | 0 | 1 | 0.13 | 31 | 0 |
| Mosquera | 6 | 5.5 | 90 | 0 | 0 | 0.00 | 27 | 0 |
| GabrielYC | 5 | 8.0 | 90 | 0 | 0 | 0.06 | 21 | 0 |
| Hincapie | 1 | 5.5 | 9 | 0 | 0 | 0.00 | 3 | 0 |
| Midfielders | ||||||||
| Ødegaard | 11 | 6.5 | 75 | 1 | 0 | 0.31 | 41 | 3 |
| Saka | 9 | 9.5 | 67 | 1 | 0 | 0.72 | 36 | 1 |
| Tzolis | 6 | 6.5 | 75 | 0 | 1 | 0.33 | 30 | 0 |
| Lewis-Skelly | 3 | 5.5 | 90 | 0 | 0 | 0.17 | 15 | 0 |
| Rice | 3 | 7.5 | 67 | 0 | 0 | 0.15 | 10 | 0 |
| Madueke | 1 | 6.5 | 22 | 0 | 0 | 0.04 | 8 | 0 |
| Merino | 1 | 6.0 | 14 | 0 | 0 | 0.16 | 5 | 0 |
| Eze | 1 | 6.5 | 14 | 0 | 0 | 0.04 | 4 | 0 |
| Zubimendi | 1 | 5.5 | 22 | 0 | 0 | 0.02 | 3 | 0 |
| Forward | ||||||||
| Havertz | 6 | 7.5 | 90 | 1 | 0 | 0.29 | 34 | 0 |
Full team sheet for both sides, cards, saves and defensive contributions on the Arsenal 3–0 Coventry City match page.
Three goals, three different scorers, three different assisters. No Arsenal player reached his defensive contribution threshold, so every point here came from minutes, goals, assists, the clean sheet and bonus.
Look at where the best returns came from. White returned 11 for £5.5m off an assist, a clean sheet and two bonus. Ødegaard returned the same 11 for £6.5m, with a goal and three. Gabriel, at £8.0m, returned five and picked up a booking. Saka, the most expensive player on the pitch at £9.5m, scored and finished on nine.
The shape matters more than the total. A 3-0 win spread across eight players is the hardest kind of result to own efficiently: whichever two Arsenal assets you held, you missed most of it — and the two that paid most were priced at £5.5m and £6.5m.
Minutes are the real risk, not fixtures
Five of the eleven starters came off, and the first two hooks were Saka — the most expensive player on the pitch — and Rice, both on 67 minutes. Ødegaard and Tzolis went at 75, Calafiori at 80. Saka's 67 is the number to sit with: at £9.5m he is priced for a near-90 role, and a 3-0 lead is exactly the game state in which he will keep being taken off.
The defence went the other way. White, Mosquera and Gabriel all played 90, and Lewis-Skelly played 90 at £5.5m for three points — White's eleven came at the identical price. Ninety minutes cheap is only worth owning when the points follow them.
One caveat on the back line that is easy to miss: it is settled right now because Saliba and Timber are both injured with no return date. Mosquera is holding down a £5.5m place in a back four that is one recovery away from being someone else's.
The chances say Saka, the price says otherwise
Three goals came from 1.88 team xG, against Coventry's 0.21 — a good performance and an above-par conversion.
Saka's 0.64 xG was the highest of anyone on the pitch, by some distance, and he made it in 67 minutes; everyone else at Arsenal sat under 0.30. That is the case for the £9.5m tag. Nine points from it, against Ødegaard's 11 at £6.5m, is the case against — and £3.0m is a midfielder's worth of squad elsewhere.
What the market did about it
| Player | £ | SEL | GW1 | IN | OUT | NET |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CalafioriDEF | £5.5m | 40.5% | 9 | 132k | 12k | +120k |
| ØdegaardMID | £6.5m | 9.8% | 11 | 111k | 9k | +103k |
| GyökeresFWD | £7.5m | 8.3% | 0 | 4k | 83k | −79k |
| TzolisMID | £6.5m | 25.4% | 6 | 90k | 13k | +78k |
| KonsaDEF | £4.5m | 12.2% | 0 | 19k | 95k | −76k |
| HavertzFWD | £7.5m | 6.4% | 6 | 73k | 8k | +65k |
| Bruno G.MID75% chance | £7.0m | 3.6% | 0 | 384 | 50k | −50k |
| WhiteDEF | £5.5m | 5.2% | 11 | 46k | 6k | +40k |
| RiceMID | £7.5m | 17.9% | 3 | 15k | 52k | −37k |
| SakaMID | £9.5m | 10.0% | 9 | 32k | 7k | +24k |
Calafiori is the most-transferred-in player in the game this week. Ødegaard is fourth, Tzolis sixth, Havertz seventh — four Arsenal players inside the seven most-bought. At the same time Konsa is the second-most-sold player in the game and Gyökeres the third, with Rice and Bruno G. also inside the top ten out.
That is not indecision, it is a re-sort. The market bought the GW1 result and sold the players who were not part of it, and the two flows are largely the same managers moving money around one club. Net, Arsenal are up close to 113,000 selections since the deadline.
Some of that flow is worth copying and some of it is already priced in. The calls below say which.
Buy, sell, swap
| Player | Price | Pts | Val | Sel |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| £6.5m | 11 | 1.7 | 9.8% | |
| £5.5m | 11 | 2.0 | 5.2% | |
| £5.5m | 6 | 1.1 | 6.1% | |
| £5.5m | 9 | 1.6 | 40.5% | |
| £6.5m | 6 | 0.9 | 25.4% | |
| £9.5m | 9 | 0.9 | 10.0% |
Buy: Ødegaard, £6.5m
Eleven points for £6.5m, off a goal and three bonus — no Arsenal player scored more, and only White matched it. At 9.8% ownership that is still a differential, at a price that does not force anything else out of the squad.
The price is the argument. He started last season at £8.0m and paid 74 points for it — one goal, seven assists and barely fifteen full matches' worth of minutes — and he ended it at £7.8m. He starts this one at £6.5m, £1.5m below where he opened last August and the cheapest he has been since 2022/23, the season he returned 212 points from that same £6.5m tag. One match does not promise that again. It is the first evidence in two years pointing back towards it.
The trade-off is the 75 minutes and the depth behind him. Arsenal carry Tzolis, Eze, Madueke and Martinelli at £6.5m in the same band, and Merino at £6.0m. That is a rotation risk priced into the tag rather than an argument against it — but it is why he is a buy at 9.8% and would be a hold at 30%.
Sell: Gyökeres, £7.5m
Zero minutes, no injury flag, no news line — and Havertz played 90 and scored the third. That leaves two readings: rotation, or a pecking order. At £7.5m and 8.4% ownership, only one of them is worth waiting through.
The trade-off is real and should be stated plainly: this is one match, and selling a striker who returns to the XI in GW2 means buying back at a four-point hit. If you can afford to hold a non-playing forward for one more week, that is a defensible call. If he is in your XI, it is not.
Sell: Konsa, £4.5m
Signed on GW1 deadline day, 12.2% owned, zero minutes. A £4.5m defender is bought as bench fodder that occasionally starts, and the whole trade depends on the "occasionally starts" half. Right now Arsenal's back four is White, Gabriel, Mosquera and Calafiori, and Konsa was not in it.
The trade-off: if Saliba's back or Timber's groin keeps them out much longer, a £4.5m Arsenal defender is exactly the asset that becomes useful. That is a bet on someone else's injury, though, and 12.2% of managers are currently paying for it in bench value.
Swap: Rice, £7.5m → Ødegaard, £6.5m
Rice played 67 minutes for three points at £7.5m. Ødegaard played 75 for eleven at £6.5m. Same club, same fixtures, same clean sheet — £1.0m freed and eight points of difference in a single match. Of the moves the market is making this week, this is the one with the least to argue against it.
The trade-off is that Rice's floor depends on defensive-contribution points, and he made six of the twelve a midfielder needs. Two more weeks like that and the £7.5m stops being defensible at all.
Swap: Gabriel, £8.0m → White or Mosquera, £5.5m
Gabriel returned five points and a booking. Two team-mates in the same back four, on the same clean sheet, returned 11 and six for £2.5m less each. White is 5.2% owned against Gabriel's 29.5%, which makes the cheaper player the differential as well as the better GW1 scorer.
The trade-off is that Gabriel played the full 90 on the same clean sheet, and a yellow card is what separated him from six. One match at £8.0m is not a case against him; two would be. The £2.5m is what you are really deciding about.
Hold, with a note: Calafiori and Tzolis
Calafiori at 40.4% is the template Arsenal defender and did nothing wrong — nine points, an assist, 80 minutes. There is no reason to sell him and no edge in owning him. Tzolis at 25.4% is the more interesting one: signed in July, six points and an assist on debut, and already a quarter of the game owns him. That is a lot of faith staked on a player with one Premier League appearance. Nothing in GW1 argues against it; nothing in GW1 settles it either.
The fixtures argue against piling in now
Arsenal's next two are Aston Villa away and Chelsea at home, both rated 4. The run only softens after that — Sunderland away and Brighton away at 3, then Leeds at home at 2 in GW6.
That is the argument for buying one Arsenal asset this week rather than three. The squad is rated 4½ stars, joint-highest in the league, so this is a hold-not-value club: the players are good enough to cash in any run they get. But the run they get in the next fortnight is the hardest back-to-back pair in their opening eight, and the market is currently paying a post-3-0 price for it. Use the fixture planner to see where your other clubs sit across the same window.
The exception is the cheap defence. At £5.5m, White and Mosquera are priced so that a hard fixture costs you nothing you were counting on — that is the sizing rule that makes a difficult run survivable, and it is why the cheap end of this squad is the part worth owning through GW2 and GW3.
Full minutes, cards, saves and defensive contributions for both sides are on the Arsenal 3-0 Coventry City match page, and GW2's trip to Villa Park has its own fixture page. For where these prices sit against the rest of the league, the player statistics table sorts on every column used above, and transfer strategy covers when a swap like Rice-to-Ødegaard is worth a hit and when it is worth waiting a week.